August 25th, 2010 by
Alica
It is with regret that I must tell you the video chat with Brandon Valley Challenger editor Jill Meier and MED-Star ambulance owner Jay Masur will not be online Thursday as planned. Jay Masur’s office has said he has a family emergency that prevents him from participating. A new date for the online chat has not yet been scheduled.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
10 Comments »
August 24th, 2010 by
Alica
Brandon Valley Challenger Editor Jill Meier will have a video chat with Med-Star CEO Jay Masur on Thursday about the recent dispute over its coverage area and other issues. Log on to www.brandonInfo.com at 10 a.m. Thursday to watch the interview and join the conversation through a live chat.
Do you plan to log in to watch the live chat? Will you join in the questions?
If you are unable to watch the chat live, you can watch it later on www.brandoninfo.com.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
29 Comments »
July 1st, 2010 by
Alica
Minnehaha County Commissioners have created a new ambulance district, which includes Valley Springs. MED-Star of Brandon and Rural/Metro of Sioux Falls both have said they plan to apply to be the designated ambulance service for that area.
Which do you think should get the contract, and why?
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
92 Comments »
December 16th, 2008 by
Alica
MED-Star Paramedic Services will handle Brandon’s emergency medical services for a second year, the city council decided Monday night. MED-Star was the only service to apply.
What do you think of the decision? If you are unhappy with it, what would you have had the council do instead, since no one else applied?
MED-Star owner Jay Masur asked the council to consider extending the contract to three or five years. Right now the contract must be renewed annually. What do you think of renewing the contract? If the city has a service that is doing well, why use taxpayer money for annual paperwork? However, if the service is not doing well, a five-year contract could cause problems.
Does the ambulance ordinance contain any provisions for voiding the contract, on either side? If not, should it have?
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance, City business |
286 Comments »
September 19th, 2008 by
Alica
At a special council meeting Sept. 6, Craig Jacobus came to Brandon from Nebraska to give the city council an in-person quality report on MED-Star ambulance service. Jacobus reviews reports of all MED-Star’s calls and reports to the city monthly and quarterly on them.
The council asked Jacobus to report in person because two members of the public, Jana Schroeder and Linda Weber, had asked questions at an Aug. 4 meeting, and council members thought Jacobus could answer those questions better than they could. The council did follow up on a question concerning documentation, however. At that time, MED-Star was not current with documentation on employees, licenses and the like, which is a violation of the ambulance service’s contract with the city. The council did not discuss terminating the contract but instead requested the documentation and asked MED-Star owner, Jay Masur, to come to an Aug. 18 council meeting. Masur provided the paperwork but declined to appear at the meeting.
Neither Schroeder nor Weber were at the Sept. 6 meeting. Neither were Mayor Larry Beesley nor Alderman Harry Buck. Masur and several members of his staff were at the Sept. 6 meeting but did not speak.
No one from the Brandon Valley Challenger attended the Sept. 6 meeting. Neither Challenger editor Jill Meier nor I knew about the meeting ahead of time. Notice of the meeting was posted on the city Web site, but neither of us saw it in time. I viewed the recording of the meeting and reported on it on www.brandoninfo.com Sept. 19. My story also is scheduled to appear in the Challenger on Sept. 24.
Jacobus gave MED-Star high marks before the council on how it’s caring for patients in emergency situations. “MED-Star more than fulfills the obligation that anybody within the state would ever ask anybody to do,” Jacobus said.
What do you think of all this? The public certainly can ask the city questions and has a right to look at public documents. Most people don’t attend council meetings, though. Do you? Do you check on city business by looking at the city Web site, www.brandonsd.com? I check that site regularly, but apparently not often enough.
When the school district is planning a special meeting, they fax an agenda to the Brandon Valley Challenger office, but the city does not. Should it? Then again, should the city mail, fax or e-mail regular residents whenever a special meeting is planned?
If you don’t go to council meetings or look at the city Web site, do you get your city news from the Challenger or www.brandoninfo.com?
Or do you even follow city news at all?
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
80 Comments »
August 20th, 2008 by
Alica
MED-Star’s contract requires them to notify the city whenever there is a change in employees, vehicles or licenses. Since MED-Star got the contract last year, the city hadn’t received any updates until administrators sent a letter requesting the information.
MED-Star brought everything up to date as soon as asked.
Are you satisfied with that? Why or why not?
I use my car for my work, so I’m required to give my employer proof of insurance. Every six months, I photocopy the card I get from my insurance company, and give it to the human resources department. Sometimes I forget, though, and they send me a reminder. Is this the same sort of situation?
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
43 Comments »
April 21st, 2008 by
Alica
The first quarter ambulance report is on the agenda of tonight’s City Council meeting. Are you interested in knowing what’s in it?
The council meets at 6 p.m. at the city council chambers, 308 S. Main Ave.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance, City business |
22 Comments »
December 20th, 2007 by
Alica
Bloggers recently have posted a lot of opinions about the city’s new ambulance provider. And no matter if you are happy about the new provider in town, or not happy, the provider is who it is.
My question is, what will you yourself do in the coming year to make our city’s emergency services the best they can be? What will you do in the next five years to help make the city’s emergency services successful?
What can we all do to enhance our city?
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
213 Comments »
December 14th, 2007 by
Alica
According to a story on brandoninfo.com, Med-Star will start taking 911 calls at 7 a.m. Monday.
Of course, we hope they won’t get any calls for a long, long while. We sure don’t want anyone to get sick or injured no matter who takes the calls.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
122 Comments »
November 15th, 2007 by
Alica
Tonight, the City Council will hold its regular briefing meeting in the council chambers at 5:30 p.m. One of the evening’s topics will be what to do about ambulance quality assurance. There are varying opinions about whether the city’s ordinance requires quality assurance to be in place on the day MED-Star’s license goes into effect.
That was supposed to happen today, but most likely it won’t. Metro Communications isn’t ready to dispatch 911 calls to MED-Star, and it’s not known when they will be.
Ambulance quality assurance also is on the agenda for the council’s next regular meeting, which will be Nov. 19.
How do you think the city should proceed with quality assurance? Below are some of the options that have been brought up so far. Which of them look to you like the best choice? Why? The worst choice? Why? Do you have any options not listed below that you would like the council to consider?
Can you contain your posts to discussion of the options and their benefits or drawbacks? I hope so.
Possible options (in no particular order):
1. Recruit one or more medical professionals who are Brandon residents.
2. Recruit one or more medical professionals without regard to where they live.
3. Rely on MED-Star’s medical director.
4. Contract with REMSA.
5. Contract with an out-of-state professional agency.
6. Rely on the City Council for review.
7. Go without review.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
23 Comments »
November 6th, 2007 by
colson
Just when it looked like the long months of deciding whether or not MED-Star should be allowed to operate in Brandon, it appears the issue has hit another roadblock.
The three committee members named to oversee the calls and ensure a quality service have all resigned, citing personal reasons.
Some council members say that without a committee Jay Masur and MED-Star should not be able to start doing business in Brandon.
Others say the ambulance service’s medical director could do that work.
It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
454 Comments »
October 14th, 2007 by
Alica
This item is part of the City Council’s consent agenda for their meeting Monday: “Conditional use application for sleeping rooms at 922 E. Redwood Boulevard.” That’s the address of Med-Star Ambulance.
In the Oct. 4 Planning & Zoning Commission minutes, I found this: “A Conditional Use Application was presented for 922 E. Redwood Boulevard. Joe, the director of the service was present for discussion. Land is zoned B-2. Establishing 24-7 operations, allowing sleeping quarters for employees. Sleeping quarters would be on the northeast of the building, on ground level. Garages for the ambulances are on the front of the building, sleeping quarters are separate by a wall between the garages. Dave (Swier, city building inspector) will stop by and inspect the arrangement. Commissioner (Jon) Jacobson moved Commissioner (Tim) Jorgenson seconded to approve the application with the condition that it passes Dave’s inspection. Commissioner (Linda) Weber abstained from the vote. A roll call vote showed (Chuck) Parsons, (Paul) Bosch, Jacobson and Jorgenson aye, Weber abstaining. Motion carried.” (Note: I inserted the parentheses in the quote. Commissioner Marv Peterson was absent from the meeting.)
I have these questions:
Who is Joe? What is his last name? Isn’t Jay Masur the director of the service?
Does asking for sleeping quarters mean Med-Star is confident their application to be licensed in Brandon will be approved?
Why did Commissioner Weber abstain from the vote?
The consent agenda is scheduled to be heard at 7 p.m. Monday. In a consent agenda, a bunch of items are usually listed together and voted on all at the same time, with one vote covering all the items. In addition to the sleeping quarters conditional use permit request, there are four other items in Monday’s consent agenda: two home occupation applications for daycares, a development plan for Pace Manufacturing, and some plats.
Thanks to the City of Brandon for posting agendas and minutes on the city Web site.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
10 Comments »
August 3rd, 2007 by
jtatefinn
After a month of having the new ambulance law in effect, Brandon has its first applicant to provide the city with 911 medical service: MED-Star Paramedic Ambulance, Inc.
The newly appointed three-member quality assurance committee has yet to set a date to review the application. Thing is, even though this is a mayor-appointed committee, the review process most likely won’t be public, according to City Administrator Dennis Olson. This is, in large part, due to the fact the committee will oversee the background checks of MED-Star’s employees.
The three members include Dr. Nicolas Van Es, a physician with Sanford Health in Brandon, and residents Mary Brooks and Bonnie Petersen, a certified nurse practitioner at Sanford Health Clinic in Brandon.
While I understand the need to keep things like social security numbers and home addresses private, I’m not sure I agree that the entire review process remain closed to the public. When the final recommendation is presented to the city council, I want to know what the decision was based on, considering the numerous requirements on the ambulance service application form. (Check out the requirements here. Click on “404,” then scroll down to “6-7-23.”)
What do you think? Would you have any interest sitting in on the review process or is hearing the recommendation (perhaps with or without explanation - we’ll hope for the best and assume *with*) presented at city council enough?
Posted in Ambulance |
17 Comments »
April 26th, 2007 by
Alica

The City Council meeting area includes pictures of the six mayors Brandon has had since the city incorporated in 1973. Photo by Alica P. Thiele
The Brandon City Council will hold its special meeting Tuesday instead of Monday because of a conflict with the senior athletic banquet.
The Council will meet at 6 p.m. Tuesday, May 1, at City Hall, to talk about possible changes to the city’s ambulance license application. The Council also may talk about cha nges to the recently-passed Ordinance #381.
City Hall is on Main Street.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
No Comments »
April 26th, 2007 by
Alica
On April 23 at a special meeting, the Brandon City Council made some changes to the recently-passed Ordinance #381, the ambulance ordinance. That would be considered the first reading.
The Council scheduled a second special meeting for April 30, to discuss changes to the ambulance license application. At that meeting, the Council may hold the second reading of the ordinance changes.
If they do, and pass it, the ordinance would have to be published in the Brandon Valley Challenger. The earliest that could happen would be May 9. Then, if no one turns in a petition referring the matter to a public vote, the ordinance changes would go into effect 20 days after publication, or May 28.
If the Council doesn’t hold the second reading of the ordinance at the April 30 special meeting, they would probably do so at their next regular meeting, which is May 7. Then publication would be May 16 and the law would go into effect June 4 if no one contests it.
The founding fathers knew what they were doing when they devised a system of government with many checks and balances. The first amendment guarantees citizens the right to petition the government. That’s to help keep bad laws from being passed. The first amendment also guarantees citizens the right to voice their opinion of government proceedings. That promotes discussion. It’s not a perfect system, but it’s pretty good.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
2 Comments »
April 24th, 2007 by
colson
The Brandon City Council have made some changes to the recently-approved ambulance ordinance that they hope address some of the concerns the public had.
They addressed response time, availability of service, medical oversight and insurance.
It remains to be seen whether those answers all the questions the public has.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
8 Comments »
April 17th, 2007 by
Alica
The Brandon City Council will hold a special meeting Monday, April 23, at 6 p.m. at City hall to discuss changes in the application for ambulance service and changes to Ordinance #381.
The council may or may not take action at this meeting. If not, the next regular meeting of the Council is Monday, May 7.
I wonder what changes the Council is considering for the application. They just passed it in January.
Please contact your Council representative before these meetings to voice your opinion. It would be good to show up at the meetings too, but contacting them ahead of time is best, because it will give your Council representative time to think about your comments. Please, also post your thoughts here. I suspect Council members are reading the blog even if they do not post. (Or maybe they do. We don’t know who the screen names belong to.)
Contact information for the mayor and City Council members can be found on www.brandoninfo.com. Look under the “Welcome To Brandon” section and follow the links to city government.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
15 Comments »
April 13th, 2007 by
Alica
On Monday when the City Council canvasses votes for the election, the ambulance Ordinance #381 will become law and the Council can start taking applications. So I looked at the application approved Jan. 2, 2007, and compared it with the application the city used when Ordinance #286 (the old ambulance ordinance) was in effect. They are different. In general, the new application is more relaxed than the old application and doesn’t require as much documentation. Also, the new application doesn’t require written plans for the type of service to be offered or for staffing.
Here is a detailed list of differences:
1. The old application requires documentation of 15 points. The new one has only 10 points. The five points that are omitted from the new application are A) a detailed statement of the type of service to be offered; B) a written plan for staffing levels; C) verification of direct medical control with documentation of an agreement with at least one Sioux Falls hospital for such control; D) a plan to comply with sanitary and safety standards; and E) proof of safety inspections by a certified mechanic.
2. Both require a listing of vehicles to be used. The old application requires documentation; the new one does not.
3. Both require a listing of employees along with their certifications, training and experience. The old application requires certification before the application is approved and again afterward, before the employee has contact with patients. The new ordinance does not require the double certification.
4. The old application requires documentation of equipment and medications by “the city’s quality assurance entity.” The new one requires documentation of equipment by REMSA standards and medication by state standards. Both applications require proof of inspection.
5. The old application requires verification of availability of a medical director, including a copy of the contract that includes certification that the medical directo has staff privileges with a Sioux Falls hospital. It also requires a copy of the doctor’s license and D.E.A. certificate. The new application requires only th name, address and phone number of the medical director’s state license.
6. Both applications require proof of insurance.
7. The old application requires a fee to “be established by resolution of the city” and requires that payment be included with the application. The new application requires a $25 but doesn’t say that payment must be included with the application.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
20 Comments »
April 10th, 2007 by
Alica
Now that Ordinance #381, the ambulance ordinance, has passed, what is the next step? Presumably the city will start taking applications for licenses. It seems likely that Med-Star will apply. Rural Metro, which has been serving the city, didn’t say before the election if they planned to apply or not (at least not publicly).
Perhaps the Garretson ambulance service will apply for a license in Brandon. A representative from Garretson came to one of the public forums.
Or maybe the Brandon Volunteer Fire Department, or even the city itself, will decide to get into the ambulance business.
What other options can you think of? Which do you think are most likely? Any predictions as to what will happen next?
We’ve been putting our ambulance thoughts under the “All Things Ambulance” thread. But now that the ordinance has passed and we’re looking ahead to the licensing process, let’s start using this thread for our discussions.
Thanks.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
15 Comments »
March 20th, 2007 by
Alica
Let’s start using just one thread to talk about the ambulance issue. All previous posts will stay as they are, but please put any new posts under this “all things ambulance” heading. That way it will be easier for people to follow the dialogue.
Feel free to post any insights you have, as well as questions, complaints, praise or general comments.
Thanks.
Posted in Uncategorized, Ambulance |
60 Comments »