Anonymous bloggers
February 17th, 2008 by
Alica
We’ve had this discussion before, but maybe now is a good time to revive it.
For those of you who have asked why this Web site allows bloggers to post anonymously, you may find an answer in Randell Beck’s column that ran in Sunday’s (Feb. 17) Argus Leader. If you missed it, you can find it on www.argusleader.com. Put your cursor over the “Voices” link at the top of the page for a pull down menu, and then move to “Voices Columnists” and click on “Randell Beck.” The headline for the column is “Putting up with extreme opinions.”
One thing I’ve noticed over time on this blog is that elected officials rarely post. At least not under their real names. This blog could be a wealth of information on community topics if people in the know would post, providing details that would increase the public’s understanding of issues.
Back when Holly Boulevard was under contruction, for example, a representative from Terin Corp., the contractor, answered questions on the blog. His comments were very helpful and were a great community service.
There were times when Kathy Ford, who was on the city council at the time, would post background information. Again, informative and helpful.
Years ago, in the early days of forums and chatting, people didn’t use their real names, but they at least picked a screen name and then stuck with it. And no two people had the same screen name. It helped to keep the various voices straight in readers’ minds.
If you read Randell Beck’s column, you will know that Argus Leader Media’s policy is to provide everyone a chance to have their say. Could we as bloggers use that opportunity to have fruitful discussion, to educate ourselves and hopefully make our community a better place?
Posted in Uncategorized |
February 18th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
Finally! Someone addressing this issue! I have intentionally stayed away from posting on these blogs because I am not going to respond to phantom voices, nor be subjected to contrary viewpoints without the decency of knowing who is disagreeing.
Annonymous responses are like holding a debate in a dark room and trying like hell to identify the sound of the voice.
February 18th, 2008 at 9:03 pm
MonteM,
Technically you’re still anonymous to most because you didn’t post your last name. AND…in the blog format anyone can post under yours and put “MonteM”
So you’re still responding to phantom voices.